TPT Sale! Shop now!

 
 


Happy Teaching! //downloads.mailchimp.com/js/signup-forms/popup/unique-methods/embed.jswindow.dojoRequire([“mojo/signup-forms/Loader”], function(L) { L.start({“baseUrl”:”mc.us2.list-manage.com”,”uuid”:”cbf24935a27cb5f458ad62415″,”lid”:”418f1f8b09″,”uniqueMethods”:true}) })
from Fun To Teach – Grammar, Language, Math, ESL/ELD, Spanish, Reading, Writing, Centers and more! https://esleld.blogspot.com/2021/11/tpt-sale-shop-now.html

A Can’t-Miss Vocabulary Activity

“How do you teach vocabulary to your ELs?” Darlyne de Hann asked this question at the end of her 5 October TESOL blog. One good answer is to ensure students get numerous opportunities to practice using the words you’re teaching. This helps students build a large vocabulary, a key to good reading. The vocabulary review activity I describe in this post can be used with English learners of all ages and in all subject areas. It’s low fuss, minimal prep, and students, not the teacher, do most of the work during the activity. What’s not to like about that?

To begin, prepare a list of words for review. If your students have devices, you can use an online flashcard program like Quizlet. If you want to stick to old school methods, simply use index cards with a word written on each card like the ones pictured.

Prereaders can use picture word cards. Before you launch the activity, demonstrate the procedure with a volunteer student partner. Put the students in pairs and give 5–10 cards to each student. Designate one partner in each pair as the rotating partner. Students then explain each word to their partners without saying it, trying to get them to guess the words. A typical exchange might go like this:

Student A: We eat it. It’s red and round.
Student B: Apple?
Student A: No, it’s small. It has little black things on the outside.
Student B: Strawberry?
Student A: Right!

And so on. When two partners have guessed all their words or when a set amount of time (e.g., 3 minutes) has elapsed (whichever comes first), one student from each pair rotates to another partner. I’d recommend three to five rotations so students get practice explaining their words to several different partners, getting better with each rotation. Every student also gets practice listening to the description of many different words because each new partner has a different vocabulary set. Customize the card decks by taking words out of the decks as students master them and adding other words as new content is studied.

This is a true information gap activity because partners don’t know which word will be described to them. Because it’s done in pairs, it also provides maximum speaking and listening opportunities. For large classes, put students into groups of four and give a card deck of 40 words to each group. Each student in the group is designated a letter A–-D. The rotations go like this:

1st rotation: A talks with B and C talks with D
2nd rotation: A-C and B-D
3rd rotation: A-D and B-C

A class of 36 high school students, for example, would need nine card decks of 40 words each. That’s 360 cards, but they can be used over and over again with different students.

I’ve used this activity with English learners from second grade to graduate school. As I circulate and listen to the student pairs during this activity, I’ve never failed to gain insights into students’ understanding (and misunderstanding!) of key vocabulary. This gives me valuable feedback to share with everyone during the activity wrap-up. For example:

  • “I noticed many people were confusing study with learn. Let’s talk about the difference between these two words.”
  • “This word gave lots of people difficulty. Let’s practice saying it correctly. Repeat: Immigrant.”
  • “I thought you’d have trouble with migrate, but everybody easily described and guessed it. Why do you think so?”

Vocabulary review activities like the one I’ve just described are an important part of teaching academic vocabulary because they make students’ learning stick. It takes class time, but it’s time well spent.

from TESOL Blog http://blog.tesol.org/a-cant-miss-vocabulary-activity/

Action Research: Untangling the Gordian Knot

I have been teaching English as a foreign language since 2010, and I have been actively involved in TESOL research since 2014 when I started my graduate studies. TESOL’s Research Agenda has made it clear that TESOL practitioners are concerned both with instructional issues and societal problems yet experience challenges in engaging in research as a part of their everyday teaching practices.

As I learned more about action research, I felt like I had found the avenue to answers for the “burning questions” (Burns, 2010, p. 28) in my practice. However, when I started my first action research study, I saw that it produced a new problem—how could I position myself both as a researcher and a teacher? That was my Gordian Knot, an ancient legend coming from my land, Turkey. According to the legend, the Gordian Knot was an impossibly tangled knot, and the one to solve it would rule all knowledge. For me, the notion of practitioners conducting research was just as tangled. However, I encountered an unexpected ally that empowered me as both a practitioner and a scholar in the field.

During my doctoral studies, I was introduced to qualitative data analysis (QDA) software, designed to help researchers systematize qualitative data. The software supported not only a robust approach to action research, but also the shift in my understanding of practitioner research in three ways.

Managing and Systematizing the Data Pile

Teaching “lends itself naturally to data collection” (Burns, 2010, p. 54); almost everything from school documents to students’ work constitutes data. The QDA software helped me to manage the data pile, connect different data sources, and understand the multimodal opportunities afforded by action research. For example, the picture in Figure 1 is a screenshot from the QDA software interface that shows how I coded a group work activity product.

Figure 1. Visual example of coding. (Ustuk, in press)

Collaborating With Scholars and Teacher Educators

A nonhierarchical relationship between applied linguistics researchers and TESOL practitioners has been recommended in TESOL circles (e.g., Mckinley, 2019; Rose, 2019). Most QDA software provides ways to collaborate with other researchers. I built such a lateral relationship with senior applied linguists in this project, and at the same time developed a sense of ownership and became the creator of educational knowledge (Dikilitaş & Griffiths, 2017). Collaborating through QDA with others, which was not as complicated as I had thought it would be, empowered me as a teacher/researcher.

Visualizing My Findings

Data analysis in action research can be a daunting experience. For me, data analysis was demystified by the visualization opportunities that come with QDA software. Visualization made it easier for me to achieve my main objective—to reflect critically upon my teaching experiences and improve my practice while building connections between codes and code groups. Visualizing such connections helped me grow my reflective stance as a practitioner.

Ultimately, one of the biggest challenges—analysis of qualitative data—turned out to be the most empowering one with the help of the software. The process empowered me to make a shift in stance from PhD candidate to teacher/researcher. I cannot say that I was Alexander the Great, and software was the sword that I used to slice the Gordian Knot. Instead, I used the software to work on the knot, untangling it by little parts, to solve the mysteries of everyday TESOL through action research.

References

Burns, A. (2010). Doing action research in English language teaching: A guide for practitioners. Routledge.

Dikilitaş, K., & Griffiths, C. (2017). Developing language teacher autonomy through action research. Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-50739-2

Mckinley, J. (2019). Evolving the TESOL teaching–research nexus. TESOL Quarterly, 53(3), 875–884. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.509

Rose, H. (2019). Dismantling the ivory tower in TESOL: A renewed call for teaching-informed research. TESOL Quarterly, 53(3), 895–905. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.517

Uştuk, Ö. (forthcoming). Pretexts: Igniter materials of dramatic elsewhere in EFL classrooms. In D. LaScotte, C. S. Mathieu, & S. David (Eds.), New perspectives on material mediation in language learner pedagogy. Springer.

from TESOL Blog http://blog.tesol.org/action-research-untangling-the-gordian-knot/

🏃 I Just Barely Made It!

Hi everyone,

During the previous year I noticed that a group of my ESL intermediate speakers of English were struggling with the phrases ‘just barely’.  


They were substituting ‘just hardly’ for just barely.  I put together a one day  ESL lesson and then created this chant for continued practice, until they became fluent with the phrase.  


I want to share the call back with any of you who might be able to use it.  So here is the little ESL call back chant I wrote to practice the phrase “just barely”.

🏃🏃
I just got out of bed,
and barely touched my breakfast.
I just grabbed my books
And headed out the door!

WHEW!
I just barely made it.
I just barely made it.
I just barely made it, to school on time!
 
Happy Teaching,
 

Hey everyone it is coming!

Cyber21

up to 25% off at Teachers Pay Teachers

November 29th and 30th

 

Get your wish lists ready!

This engaging intermediate ESL K-5 English language level bundle is packed with essential EFL, ESL and ELD activities for your English Language Learners (ELLs). The 26 resources in this K-5 bundle will take you through the school year assured that you are teaching the essential foundation of English grammar and vocabulary to your intermediate second language learners.
Included in this explicit EFL, ESL and ELD K-5 intermediate speakers of English activities bundle are:
✅ comprehensive lesson plans
✅ games
✅ songs
✅ and more
Watch the English acquisition of your English learners soar as you teach with the resources in this effective, fun and engaging bundle.

window.dojoRequire([“mojo/signup-forms/Loader”], function(L) { L.start({“baseUrl”:”mc.us2.list-manage.com”,”uuid”:”cbf24935a27cb5f458ad62415″,”lid”:”418f1f8b09″,”uniqueMethods”:true}) })
from Fun To Teach – Grammar, Language, Math, ESL/ELD, Spanish, Reading, Writing, Centers and more! https://esleld.blogspot.com/2021/11/esl-song.html

6 Questions to Ask When Designing Teacher PD

Last month, I paid homage to a number of dead ideas in professional development (PD), and they offer a great guide in thinking about what not to do! But what should we be doing? In this blog, I suggest six conceptual questions to consider if you are in the position of advising on, shaping, or making choices about the PD plan in your institution. These are the considerations—often skipped over—that lead to deeper and more impactful professional learning outcomes.

Question 1. What competencies are needed at this time?

Often, PD design decisions focus on the selection of content that will enhance the instructional skills of educators—and that becomes the top priority. However, it is important to step back to consider other competencies that are equally important, but may receive insufficient attention in PD programming. The Council of Chief State School Officers (CCSSO) have created a framework for considering four competency areas. They include

  1. the instructional domain (teachers’ need to do), but also
  2. the cognitive domain (need to know),
  3. the intrapersonal domain (need to reflect), and
  4. the interpersonal domain (need to relate).

Perhaps these other domains need the same time and effort as content-focused PD sessions.

Question 2. Where does this PD program fit within an overall, well-planned approach for school staff?

When we design a lesson, or a unit of study, there are multiple considerations in the choices we make as teachers. We consider the interests and strengths of our particular group of students, their performance data on diagnostic or assessment measures, the availability of resources and materials, local curricular requirements, and larger societal trends and goals. Planning PD programs is similar, yet few of these factors are explicit in decision-making or design meetings. Some questions to consider:

  • What does this particular professional learning event have to do with a larger vision for a professional learning curriculum?
  • Will it be connected to prior learning and set the stage for future “units” of professional learning to come?
  • How is it personalized to the needs, gaps, interests, and strengths of the staff?
  • Is it an additional stepping-stone in a pathway being constructed across the whole year or set of years in an institution?

One of the most frustrating things for educators to experience is committing time and energy to a PD initiative that disappears the following year. Research shows that being judicious about how a particular PD program will be sustained over a long period of time is essential to its success.

Question 3. When will educators be able to apply the ideas presented in this PD program?

Related to Question 2, it is well known that PD activities with no follow-up or time to process and apply ideas are far less effective than those that build in a sustainability component (just think of the expression “spray and pray”). Research suggests that successful PD design considers the necessary duration of the program, extends PD activities over the school year or semester, and “includes at least 20–40 hours of contact time.” Thinking beyond the content and skills focus or the logistics of the input sessions means considering financial resources; educator availability; the means to continue a structured, ongoing inquiry into the practices presented; and how sustained engagement will be supported and rewarded.

Question 4. Whose expertise is recognized in the design of this PD program?

It is during the design phase of deciding on PD options for staff that teachers should be at the table. When administrators determine what is important, who to consult, and what the activities should be with teachers as codecision makers, PD will be better received, more relevant, and more likely to be implemented. A recent survey of teachers in the United States found that “While teachers largely agree that school leaders think professional learning is important, just over half of teachers surveyed said they have ‘some say’ in their professional learning decisions, and nearly 20 percent said they have no input at all.” It is more important than ever that teachers play key roles in the design of PD at their institutions as the changing nature of today’s classroom makes teachers the most informed decision-makers.

Question 5. How is the learning in this PD program best measured?

Returning to the analogy of teaching students, consider the validity of only using attendance as a measure of student learning. We readily see that it would be woefully insufficient. Yet teacher PD is often measured (if measured at all) only in regard to the engagement level or attendance of staff at meetings or sessions related to the program. In order to be truly thoughtful about the design of PD, we must consider the proficiency developed by educators as a result of the program and trace the results out to student learning outcomes.

This could involve the creation of a professional learning tracking system to manage and record how teachers are moving through their learning, as suggested by Muir, in combination with a systematic approach to data collection. In this toolkit, a variety of approaches are recommended that are robust and, even if used in small ways, can inch up the quality of measurement. These approaches center around Guskey’s 5 levels of PD evaluation:

  • Level 1–Participants’ reactions: Did participants feel the professional learning was useful?
  • Level 2–Participants’ learning: Did they acquire the intended knowledge and skills?
  • Level 3–Organization support and change: Was professional learning implementation advocated, facilitated, and supported at the school?
  • Level 4–Participants’ use of new knowledge and skills: Did participants effectively apply the new knowledge and skills?
  • Level 5–Student learning outcomes: What was the impact on students?

Question 6. Why is this PD program important?

Clarity of purpose—the transparency around goals and objectives—is something we often stress as important when delivering lessons to students. However, it is all too often absent when delivering PD programming to educators. The following simple ways to promote buy-in with the audience can go a long way. Take time to ensure that participating educators understand

  • the reasoning behind the decision to offer a particular PD program,
  • who was involved in its design (must include practitioners!),
  • how it fits within the larger goals for the institution, and
  • how the ideas will be implemented and evaluated.

These aspects are covered in Questions 1–5, so as those questions are considered, they can become the opening for the PD session.

Designing PD can be a creative and dynamic process, but the return on investment hinges on its being built on a solid foundation. Take some time with your design team to consider these questions before you launch your next PD program!

In the comments, share your thoughts about these questions when planning PD!

from TESOL Blog http://blog.tesol.org/6-questions-to-ask-when-designing-teacher-pd/

Lesson Plans for Educators—Minecraft: Education Edition

Hello everyone, and welcome to another edition of the TESOL Games and Learning Blog. This month, we dig back into the world of Minecraft to explore Minecraft: Education Edition (Minecraft: EE).

One of the biggest challenges in using more games in the classroom is a lack of examples of effective use of games in the classroom. In much of the game-based learning literature, there is a focus on the software, or student perceptions about using games, without much explanation on how a game was used or what activities or materials were used with the game. Addressing this lack of materials is perhaps the best aspect of Minecraft: EE because Microsoft has created a web portal for teachers to discover and share lesson plans for use with the game.

The Minecraft: EE website is split into two main sections: the first is tools and resources teachers can use to learn how to play Minecraft. The second is on how to teach with Minecraft, including a section on how to teach with the game and a section with lesson plans and materials to be used in game.

The lesson plan section features content categories that teachers can explore based on their subject area, and each area features individual lessons to be used or collections of lessons based on a particular theme.

For example, in the language arts section, the National Writing Project has a collection of lessons designed to foster student writing in areas such as character development, story settings, and writing from different perspectives. Each of these can be used individually or combined together as a writing unit.

A notable feature of the website is the direct integration it has into the game: Lesson plans can be clicked on and opened directly in the game, making loading and saving the maps easy for even the most novice Minecraft users. Educators can also download maps to be saved and used later, share the Minecraft maps directly with students, or assign the map to students as homework. 

The only major drawback to using Minecraft: EE is that users (and students) must have an Office 365 account because the game is tied directly to Microsoft services. However, if your school or institution uses Microsoft products, using Minecraft: EE and the accompanying website can be a useful resource in helping you integrate games into your classroom practice.

For more on Minecraft and all the variations of the game you can use in your classroom, check out my September 2019 blog post.

Until next time, play more games!

from TESOL Blog http://blog.tesol.org/lesson-plans-for-educators-minecraft-education-edition/

STEM and ELT: 7 Science Reading Strategies

There is growing interest in how to teach English learners (ELs) science in the general education classroom especially because science contains a lot of reading and academic language. The strategies I discuss here, including the four strategies from Part 1 of this series, are intended for you to use immediately use in your classroom. The nine strategies come from the 2008 book Science for English Language Learners: K-12 Classroom Strategies (edited by Fathman & Crowther). Because of the depth and breadth of the reading skills strategy, today we will only be focusing on Skill 5 (Reading Skills), the fifth of the nine strategies to help ELs learn science.

You can find the first four in Part 1 of this blog series, and the remaining four strategies will be covered in Part 3. Following are the nine strategies:

  1. Connecting With Students
  2. Teacher Talk
  3. Student Talk
  4. Academic Vocabulary
  5. Reading Skills
  6. Writing Skills
  7. Collaborative Learning
  8. Scientific Language
  9. Process Skills of Inquiry

Remember, these strategies are listed and explained individually, but for ELs to gain a better understanding of the science content and the English language, the strategies should be used in combination.

Planning Reading Strategies

One of the most effective strategies to use to develop EL reading skills is to provide hands-on activities to activate prior knowledge and schema and to provide collaborative learning experiences before students are introduced to the text. By doing this, you can help your ELs derive meaning and understanding of the scientific concepts.

You should consider three phases when planning reading strategies: (1) Before learners read the text, (2) during the reading itself, and (3) after the text has been read. According to Gibbons’s Scaffolding Language, Scaffolding Learning, these are the “bridges” that provide the scaffolding that students need to bring meaning to the texts.

Before-Reading Activities

Here are a few before-reading activities that I like to use and have found great success with when teaching science, math, and STEM:

Mind map example

1. Using Visuals

Using visuals when teaching ELs is an excellent strategy because it provides an alternative mode of communication for the students. Visuals are known to improve students’ understanding and also allows the students an opportunity to interact with each other. By creating a mind map, which graphically shows student predictions of what they expect the reading to be about, you can begin to organize the student thinking into categories and show how their thoughts relate to each other. This can later be used as a collaborative group activity where the students can discuss their predictions and also as a means to connect vocabulary words.

2. Using the Title, First Sentence, or Key Words to Make Predictions About the Text

In Scaffolding Language, Scaffolding Learning, Gibbons suggests using the title, first sentence, or key words of texts to get students thinking about what the book or topic may be about. You can have the students use turn and talk to discuss their predictions and then share it out with the class. The students would explain what they used to make their prediction—title, first sentence, or key words—and why they think their prediction is correct. With turn and talk, beginner ELs may feel more confident in speaking because they are talking only to one other person and not the whole class. You can ask the students questions like “What science do you think you are going to be learning?” and “What do you know about the topic?” This provides you with a formative assessment of the students’ prior knowledge and/or any misconceptions that you can address during the reading.

Be sure to use sentence frames to help your ELs in formulating their questions and thoughts so that they can be active participants during these activities.

During-Reading Activities

Now that students have some idea of what the reading will be about, it is time for the reading. Here are a few during-reading activities:

3. Effective Questioning 

Try to bring the text alive by changing your voice, body language, and tone when reading. While reading, be sure to refer back to the class’ original predictions, the mind maps, or other strategies you used in the “before-reading” time. It is important to always find information in the book that addresses the predictions the students made and ask questions of the students to provide them with opportunities to discuss whether they want to change any of their earlier predictions.

The goal in conducting before and during reading phases is to not only engage the learners, but to provide the students with strategies that they can use when reading books alone. In other words, create “thinking readers”! It also demonstrates to the students, in real time, how to think and act like scientists, because scientists start off their experiments by making a hypothesis (guess) as to what may occur. They need to know if their hypothesis was correct or not correct, and then to try to figure out why. There is a saying that “scientists ask questions, engineers solve problems,” but both make hypotheses; making hypotheses is a staple occurrence in science and STEM. By asking questions of the students while reading, students learn to think critically. Asking questions also allows you as the teacher to identify student misconceptions, and it provides you with insight into their prior knowledge on the topic. Here is a helpful question grid that you can use, developed by Chuck Weiderhold.

4. Read the Text Multiple Times

Reading the text multiple times is highly impactful for your EL students. Repeated reads allow the EL to hear the information more than one time, providing them with increased comprehension. As a person married to a polyglot, I had noticed way before I started working with ELs that the more I heard a topic discussed, the better I became at comprehending it, and, more importantly, the more I began to remember common words and their meanings. This same thing happens for the ELs in your class.

This is extremely beneficial in particular for science because of the rich academic vocabulary specific to science. So, when you are reading, be sure to read the text aloud several times and draw attention to vocabulary words by writing them on the board, pointing them out when reading, or connecting the vocabulary word to a mind map created during the before phase. I also recommend having the students chorally repeat the word in order to help with recognition and/or pronunciation.

After-Reading Activities

5. Create a Story Map

A story map, similar to the mind map, is a visual representation of the main features of the story. The only difference is that the story map is specific to the story using facts and not predictions. In Scaffolding Language, Scaffolding Learning, Gibbons advises using the information acquired in the first two phases, before and during, to have the students address their predictions based on facts from the story map. Which predictions were correct and what supported that prediction? Or what predictions were incorrect and what information did you use to show that the prediction was incorrect?

6. Think-Pair-Share

Think-Pair-Share is an awesome after-reading activity. It promotes not only critical thinking, but it also provides an opportunity for all of your students to collaborate with each other. ELs need to continually use the new language in multiple registers in order to develop the new language. Register refers to the ways an individual uses language differently in different circumstances: in small group, peer to peer, and whole group. Each of these registers requires a different way to use the language. Think-Pair-Share can begin the process of allowing an EL to actively participate in a more informal setting as they develop more understanding of English academic language.

7. Exit Slips as a Formative Comprehension Check

Exit slips are one of my all-time favorite end-of -class activity! Yet, unfortunately, many teachers skip this part of the lesson for the sake of time. Exit slips are a type of formative assessment and can be used to guide the next day’s lesson. If the majority of your students leave the lesson with major deficits in understanding the lesson, how can you continue to teach the next piece successfully? Answer: You can’t! And for your ELs, this can be devastating to their comprehension of the content.

Exit slips can be as simple as:

  • Write one science term you learned today.
  • Rate your understanding of today’s discussion of photosynthesis on a scale from 1-10 and ask what can be done to improve your understanding.
  • Are the three questions on the board true or false? Explain your answers.

Once again, this can be done in pairs, small groups, or the whole group. For ELs, it may be more beneficial to use pairs or small groups where they can feel more comfortable sharing their thoughts and have the opportunity to hear the language used in another register. Also, don’t forget about sentence starters! They are, again, a great way to ensure that your ELs can participate in the activity.


It is important to remember that students whose first language is not English will need supports in learning literacy. That support is compounded when learning specific content, like science, math, and STEM, because of the academic language. But by dividing the reading and activities into before, during, and after, ELs receive the input in manageable pieces. Here is a link to other before, during, and after reading strategies.

Are there reading strategies that you use when teaching science, math, or STEM to your ELs? If so, please share in the comments, below!

from TESOL Blog http://blog.tesol.org/stem-and-elt-7-science-reading-strategies/

Self-Care for Writing Teachers

The COVID-19 pandemic seems to have played tricks on my sense of time, and, with that, my usual self-care routines. I feel like each academic term is moving faster than the previous one. While I can still prepare my daily classes, I’m falling behind with providing feedback and grading my students’ written work. In talking with colleagues around the world, it sounds like I’m not alone, either. This month, I want to share some strategies for writing teachers who are also feeling overwhelmed in their work.

Shift the Work of Learning to Students

This first set of suggestions focuses on ways we can revise our curriculum to take the burden off ourselves for providing all the input. I’ve written previously about some ways to plan lessons that support students toward independence in their writing. One of my favorite approaches is genre study, which guides students through a process of text analysis that expands their understanding of the language and structure of specific genres. (Here are some genre-based lessons from NCTE and a description of Andrew-Vaughn and Fleischer’s Unfamiliar Genre Project.) Through genre study, students also develop the metalanguage for talking about texts and the strategies for analyzing texts on their own.

Building a unit around the writing process can also take the burden off the teacher. Instead of having to respond to all aspects of a long final paper, we can provide informal input throughout the process, starting before students have even committed to a topic. At each step of the process, we can monitor where students are struggling and intervene before they go too far in the wrong direction with a project. Peer response and self-response are valuable ways to reduce the burden on teachers as well; the key is to scaffold the process and set students up to give each other useful feedback rather than just waste time.

We can point students to support for their writing from beyond the classroom. Introduce students to external resources, like a campus tutoring or writing center where they can talk about their texts with trained tutors. During a tutoring session, students can ask questions about their understanding of an assignment and get feedback on drafts at any stage of the process. Depending on students’ age and maturity, they might also benefit from learning about electronic resources they can use to get automated feedback, such as Grammarly or the spelling and grammar checks built into Google Docs.

Managing Feedback Processes

Inviting students to play a meaningful role in assessment can further improve what students write and consequently reduce the need for teachers to give extensive but repetitive feedback. In introducing an assignment, we can collaboratively work with our students to create the rubric. The process of negotiating a rubric gives students a deeper understanding of what they should do (and not do) in writing their texts, reducing the number of questions they ask and the amount of commenting we have to do to point them in the right direction. Portfolios, in which students select what is most meaningful about their work and tell you what they have learned from it, also lessen the emotionally draining busy work of writing comments that students will then ignore.

When you respond to students’ writing, consider focused (instead of comprehensive) feedback. Choose a few key points and ignore other things you see in students’ writing. Points you might consider include:

  • Learning objectives for the unit
  • Language covered or emphasized in class
  • Essential aspects of the genre
  • Areas of most importance for each student

Writing conferences can also be used to reduce the amount of time you spend writing comments on students’ papers. A conference can last anywhere from 30 seconds (for a brief check-in during class time on a single point) to 15–20 minutes or longer. Have students audio record (or Zoom record) their conference for reference while they are revising their work. Students should write down revisions and corrections while in the conference so they don’t forget. If you don’t have time to hold conferences with students, screen recording your spoken comments while reading through their papers can serve as a proxy, saving you the need to write your feedback.

While most conferences occur in the middle of the writing process, it is also possible to hold assessment conferences after students have submitted their final draft. I have found it to be a time-saver to read the text and talk through my comments with a student rather than marking their paper in advance, although you need to have clear grading criteria established so you can be consistent across students. Another approach I have used when trying to turn around papers quickly is to do holistic grading—very fast review of each paper, providing a single numeric score based on a rubric—followed by optional conferences for students who want to get more feedback on their texts. This works best when the whole course is focused on a particular genre, especially one in preparation for a test (such as a TOEFL prep course). The students who want to know more will sign up for conferences, and the ones who just want a score can get their grade while they still remember the task.

Overall Self-Care

While the above suggestions have been intended specifically for writing teachers, all teachers need to practice self-care in order to avoid burnout and stay healthy. No matter what level or subject we teach, we need to make time in our schedules for ourselves. If you are scheduling one-to-one student conferences, be sure to create breaks in between sessions to get up, walk around, drink some tea, or take a walk. Whether lesson planning or writing comments on students’ essays, treat the work as a series of tasks and pace yourself, doing a chunk of the work and then shifting to a different task. Stop working at a designated quitting time, even if you aren’t finished, and return to it the next day. Set several small goals (e.g., comment on five or 10 papers rather than the whole stack) and reward yourself for accomplishing each of those goals.

Working on our own to plan lessons and grade papers can become isolating and exhausting. We can also be better teachers by networking and socializing with colleagues both at our own workplace and in a larger professional community. As Laura Baecher highlights, this networking no longer needs to be confined to in-person events, either, but can happen just as productively through social media.

Please take care of yourselves, writing teachers, so that you can continue to give your students the careful teaching and support you want to offer.

from TESOL Blog http://blog.tesol.org/self-care-for-writing-teachers/

English Learners and Specific Learning Disability


As ESL ELD teachers we are always worried about the misidentification of English learners.  Specific Learning Disability (SLD) is a language and literacy-related disability referring to a psychological processing disorder.  If focuses on understanding or using spoken or written language. 

Determining whether an EL’s learning difficulties are from language or something else is a tangled web.

Like many ELD teachers, I am often asked questions from colleagues and specialists that seek clarification and guidance on deciding how to untangle this web. 

Here is a recent question/inquiry I received:

“For this little person, since you see other students with ELD needs, would you say her challenges are based on ELD needs or that it’s likely she has a learning disability? Any guidance or advice you could offer in this case would be greatly appreciated.”


As teams of educators ponder how to work best with English Learners, they can reflect on many different approaches.

  

Here is a preliminary list of considerations I offer our staff:

·      What different types of interventions has she had and what were the outcomes?
·      What kind of differentiation has been used in the classroom?
·      Has she been in classrooms with a teacher who has been trained in SIOP?
·   Consider whether the learning environment appropriately supports or has supported the student and her/his language needs.
·      Use the data supplied here to examine student language development and performance.
·      Conference with parents to see what THEY are noticing about their child.  Ask questions about the child’s language abilities in both English and the native language.  This is important because students who do not have a solid foundation in their first language struggle much more when learning English.  Does the student have a strong native language?
·      Analyze student data to compare student progress in relation to peers who are making typical progress over time.
·      Where are the gaps?  If a phonics assessment has been made look for sounds/letter combinations that were incorrect.  Are those errors that are sounds or combinations that are different or nonexistent in the native language?
 
 
Click here if you would like to download this quick guideline.
 

 
I would love to hear what considerations you offer your school teams when working with ELLs.
 
Happy Teaching!


 


❣️

//downloads.mailchimp.com/js/signup-forms/popup/unique-methods/embed.jswindow.dojoRequire([“mojo/signup-forms/Loader”], function(L) { L.start({“baseUrl”:”mc.us2.list-manage.com”,”uuid”:”cbf24935a27cb5f458ad62415″,”lid”:”418f1f8b09″,”uniqueMethods”:true}) })

from Fun To Teach – Grammar, Language, Math, ESL/ELD, Spanish, Reading, Writing, Centers and more! https://esleld.blogspot.com/2021/11/English-learners-specific-learning-disability-esl.html